(August 2019)
This is an endorsement and is subject to all the terms and conditions in CO 1000–Commercial Output Program–Property Coverage Part, unless specifically modified or otherwise provided for in this endorsement.
The coverage provided by this endorsement starts with the definition of
Off-site server. Because that definition is part of the CO 1000, it is provided
here for reference in this article.
Off-site Server must meet all of the following conditions:
There is no coverage for an off-site server under the
CO 1000 because it is listed as business personal property not covered. This
means that not only is there no direct physical damage there is also no loss of
earning coverage.
This endorsement provides coverage for either or both direct physical damage and loss of earnings for off-site servers.
There are two coverages provided and only one must be selected. This means that loss of earnings coverage can be purchased without direct damage coverage.
When Supplemental Marine Coverage is selected four different entries are required:
When Supplemental Income Coverage is selected, three entries are required, and two entries are optional.
Example: Pellington, Inc. leases a server that is located off its premises. The server is housed and maintained by the leasing company. It is Pellington’s contractual responsibility to insure the leased server. Because the server is not covered on its CO 1000, coverage is purchased for the server using CO 1289–Off-Site server Coverage and Interruption of Web Site. The schedule is completed as follows: Both Supplemental Marine and Supplemental Income Coverages are selected with a check and limits entered as follows:
|
Note: Coverage applies only if a check is placed beside Supplemental Marine Coverage on CO 1071–Off-Site Server Schedule and required limits entered.
The Off-Server Coverage is an additional Supplemental Marine Coverage. This means that the opening language for the Supplemental Marine Coverage in the CO 1000 should be reviewed in order to determine how this coverage works with other supplemental marine coverages in the CO 1000.
1. Off-Site Server
Coverage is provided when a covered peril causes a direct physical loss to either of the following:
In addition to the server, there is coverage for the direct physical damage to the software when that software is actually housed on the off-site server. This is further limited because this software coverage is available only if duplicates of the software are stored at a building that is at least 100 feet away from the premises where the off-site service is hosted.
Example: A fire occurs at the location where Pellington’s server is housed. It is not damaged by the fire but there is some smoke damage. There is coverage for up to $75,000 for the smoke damage after the $1,000 deductible is paid by Pellington. |
2. Virus and Hacking
Coverage
Virus and hacking coverage direct damage loss to the off-site server is also covered. However, there is no coverage for loss or damage due to any of the following:
Example: Despite its best efforts to prevent it, hackers accessed
Pellington’s off-site server. The hackers altered the programs so that
inappropriate emails were sent to major customers. They also copied
proprietary program information. In addition, they deleted some key
components that prevented important functions from being performed. The first
two items are not covered but the last item is covered because there is
direct damage to the software that must be repaired. The software can be
repaired quickly because Pellington keeps duplicates of the software at its location
rather than at the server location. The most that is paid in this loss is $25,000 after Pellington pays is $1,000
deductible. |
3. Deductible
This coverage has its own deductible that is entered on the Off-Site Server Schedule. It applies per occurrence.
4. Applicable Limit
The maximum limit in a single occurrence is the Off-Site Server Limit or the Off-Site Server (Virus or Hacking) Limit. The policy is unclear as to how it would respond if the Off-Site Server and the Virus and Hacking Coverages were part of the same occurrence.
Note: Coverage applies only if a check is placed beside Supplemental Income Coverage on the CO 1071–Off-Site Service Schedule and required limits entered.
The Interruption of Web Site Coverage is an additional Supplemental Income Coverage. This means that the opening language for the Supplemental Income Coverage in the CO 1001–Commercial Output Program – Income Coverage Part should be reviewed in order to determine how this coverage works with other supplemental income coverages in the CO 1001.
1. Interruption of
Web Site Coverage
Earnings coverage extends to earnings that are lost because the named insured’s business is interrupted due to direct physical loss to any or all of the following:
The loss must be caused by a covered peril. Coverage begins with the direct physical loss and ends when the named insured resumes or could have resumed operations.
Example: The
fire at the location where
Pellington’s off-site server is housed resulted in the server being down for 48
hours because the fire damaged the air conditioner that cools the server. The
loss of earnings sustained during the downtime
is covered for up $200,000. Pellington is responsible for the first two hours
of earnings loss because of its waiting period entry. |
2. Virus and Hacking
Coverage
Loss of earnings caused by virus and hacking direct damage loss is also covered. The following limits the coverage provided:
Example: Pellington’s server must be down for 36 hours following the hacker attack. The decision was made to disinfect and reinstall the software because tracking down the specific damage was too time-consuming. There is coverage for up to $100,000 but Pellington is responsible for the first two hours of earnings loss because of its waiting period entry. |
3. Coverage Conditions
Coverage for earnings is provided only if the following apply:
Example: Pellington files a claim for $50,000 loss of earnings following the fire loss. The insurance company reviews their income history and discovers that this $50,000 loss was actually made up by a significant increase in volume in the 128 hours following the downtime. Because of this unusual spike, Pellington did not actually suffer any loss of earnings at all, so the claim is denied. |
4. Waiting Period
No earnings coverage applies until 12 hours following the direct physical damage to the server, the software, or the location. This period can be modified on the Schedule.
5. Coverage
Limitation
The coverage is limited to no more than 14 days. If the waiting period is the default 12 hours, the coverage ends 14 days and 12 hours after the direct damage to the server, the software, or the location. If the waiting period is zero, the coverage ends 14 days after the damage and if the waiting period is any other another number the coverage is the 14 days plus that other number.
This default number of hours can be increased on the Schedule. However, it still ends once the named insured’s business resumes.
Note: The CO 1289 does not state that the Coverage Limitation of 14 days can be increased but the CO 1071 contains a space labeled “Coverage Limitation – We do not pay for loss or earnings after:” This would suggest that an entry in this area would modify the 14 days in this Limitation.
Example: A
tornado roars through Roseville. It destroys the location where Pellington’s
off-site server is housed and also destroys Pellington’s own location. This
means that the software duplicates for the server are also destroyed. It will
take a minimum of three months to reproduce the necessary proprietary
programs. Pellington entered 20 days for its coverage limitation so there is
a loss of earnings coverage for up to
20 days plus two hours. Any loss is also subject to the $200,000 occurrence
loss. |
6. Applicable Limit
The maximum limit in a single occurrence is either the Interruption of Web Site Limit or the Interruption of Web Site (Virus or Hacking) Limit. The policy is unclear as to how it would respond if Interruption of Web Site Coverage and the Virus and Hacking Coverages were part of the same occurrence.
The perils excluded section of the CO 1000 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following. This applies only to the coverage provided by this endorsement.
1. Broad Exclusions
The doctrine of concurrent causation holds that coverage applies to a property loss that can be attributed to two causes, one excluded and one covered. As a result, coverage has been found for earth movement, flood, and other specifically excluded events. This set of exclusions attempts to avoid concurrent causation by stating that the event is excluded, regardless of any other causes that contribute to or aggravate the loss. With this approach, there is no coverage, even if the contributing cause of loss is normally covered.
a. Civil Authority
Loss or damage caused by the order of any civil authority is excluded. Seizure, confiscation, destruction, and quarantine of any property are examples of excluded civil authority actions. There is one exception. If the civil authority destroys the named insured’s property as a means of preventing the spread of a fire, there is coverage provided the fire itself is a covered peril.
c. Nuclear Hazard
Loss caused by nuclear reaction, nuclear radiation, or radioactive contamination is not covered. Any loss that is caused by the nuclear hazard is not considered a loss caused by fire, explosion, or smoke. There is one exception. If a direct loss by fire results from the nuclear hazard, there is coverage.
Coverage for nuclear risk is available only through nuclear coverage associations.
d. War and Military Action
This is an expanded War exclusion. There is no coverage for loss or damage caused by any of the following:
If any action involves nuclear reaction, nuclear radiation, or radioactive contamination, this exclusion applies in place of the Nuclear Hazard exclusion. There are no exceptions in this exclusion.
2. Limited Exclusions
The second group of exclusions applies to loss or damage caused by or
resulting from any of the following loss events. Some of these exclusions have
exceptions, conditions, or limitations that should be noted and reviewed
carefully.
Note: This listing has only eight exclusions while the CO 1000 has 21 limited exclusions.
a. Contamination or
Deterioration
There is no coverage when contamination or deterioration is the cause of loss or damage. Examples of contamination and deterioration are corrosion, decay, fungus, mildew, mold, rot, and rust. Contamination or deterioration is also the qualities, faults, or weaknesses that are a part of the particular off-site server that results in it damaging or even destroying itself.
There are two exceptions.
b. Criminal, Fraudulent, Dishonest or
Illegal Acts
Loss caused by criminal, fraudulent, or dishonest acts is not covered if the act(s) is committed alone or in collusion with others by any of the following:
There are two exceptions.
c. Loss of Use
The following losses are not covered:
The
only exception is the Interruption of Web Site coverage when provided in this
endorsement.
d. Pollutants
There is no coverage for loss caused by any action of pollutants. There are three exceptions.
e. Temperature/Humidity
Loss or damage because of
dryness, dampness, humidity, or extremes of temperature is not covered. There
are two exceptions.
f. Wear
and Tear
There is no coverage for loss or damage
caused by or resulting from wear and tear, marring or scratching. These losses
are excluded because they are usually normal costs of doing business. However, if
any of the above causes a covered peril, any resulting damage from that
particular peril is covered.
g. Virus or Hacking
Computer virus or hacking caused loss or
damage is not covered. This applies whether the damage is direct, indirect, or
resulting from loss of access, use, or functionality. The one exception is the
limited coverage provided under Virus and Hacking Coverage in this endorsement.
h. Voluntary Parting
If property is voluntarily given to another party, there is no coverage. There is no coverage even if the receiving party was part of a fraudulent trick or scheme.
3. Interruption of
Web Site Specific Exclusions
These exclusions apply only to the Supplemental Income Coverage part of this endorsement.
a. Bandwidth
When loss of earnings occurs because the named insured business is interrupted due to the off-site server not providing sufficient bandwidth, there is no coverage. This applies whether the interruption is limited or total. Insufficient bandwidth as used in this exclusion is when the off-site server is unable to handle the volume of data coming into it.
Example: Pellington, Inc. started a new promotion that has been receiving a lot of attention. It is graphic and video heavy. Their programmers had not anticipated the amount of traffic this promotion would generate. When the server temporarily crashes, there is no loss of earnings coverage because the reason is a lack of bandwidth. |
b. Denial of Service
Attack
When loss of earnings occurs because a denial of service attack is launched against the off-site server and interrupts the named insured’s business, there is no coverage. This exclusion applies no matter how many individuals participate of the attack and whether or not the individual(s) are employees of the named insured.
The definition of denial of service attack as used in this endorsement is the use of either malicious data traffic or false data traffic to intentionally slow down the off-site server or to actually totally disable it. Examples of such data traffic are email messages, any type of request that requires the use of that server’s memory and any type of messages or information requests that intentionally take up bandwidth.
This exclusion applies only when it is selected on the CO 1071–Off-Site Server Schedule.
Example: Certain radical groups are upset with the products Pellington is selling. They decide to make it impossible for legitimate customers to place orders by sending massive emails to the site and also sending many service inquiries. The system is quickly overcome, and the server is unable to provide service to its customers for over 24 hours. Pellington did not accept this exclusion, so the loss of earnings starting after the two-hour waiting period is paid. |